M.Padma Rao And Another v. The State Of Ap., And Another

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3706 OF 2013 Between:

'1 . tvl.Padma Rao S/o M.Prakasham occ: Govt.employee

2. Smt.lr/.Kalavathi, W/o Padma Rao occ: House wife Both R/o H.No.44-363 ZTS, I\,4oula Ali Presently R/o H.No.20-197/40, Ambedkarnagar, Shamirpet Mandal R.R.District .,,PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND

1. The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP., Hyderabad

2. IM.S.,Babu Rao, S/o Late Sailoo occ: Employee PJo H.No.3-18-71 Peddakamela Trimulghery Secunderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1O3l2O12 on the file of the V Metropolitan Itilagistrate at Medchal, Ranga Reddy District CRL.P.M.P. NO: 3352 OF 2013 Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\ilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C. No.103/2012 on the file of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, at Medchal Ranga Reddy District This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B.Sesibushan Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRIMINAL PETITION No,37O6 of 2O13

ORDER

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioners/A.1 & A.2, seeking to quash the proceedings tn C.C.No.103 of 2012 on the file of the Vi lvletropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419,420,468, 471and 1208 of 1PC.

2.

On 26,02.2021, as there was no representation for the petitioners/A.1 & A.2, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'For Orders'. Today, despite listing this matter under the caption 'For Orders', there is no representation For the petitioners/A.1 & A.2. Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the 1't respondent-State and perused the record. 3.

The material placed on record reveals that a private complaint was filed by the de-Facfo complainant before the Court below, which was referred the police under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. for investigation. The police completed investigation and filed Final Report. A perusal of the Final Report reveals that there are allegations of cheating and personation against petitioner No.1/A.1. The main allegation against the petitioners/A.1 & A.2 is that the petitioner No.1/A.1 created bogus documents in the name of his wife, i.e., petitioner No.2/A.2 and both of them illegally trespassed into the land belonging to the de-facto complainant and abused him in filthy language, threatened him with dire consequences and made an attempt to manhandle him. The allegations levelled against the

petitioners/A,1 & A.2 do constitute offences punishable under Sections 4L9,420, 468, 477 and 1208 of IPC. Therefore, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings in the subject Calendar Case against the petitioners/A.1 & A.2 as prayed for. The Criminal Petition does not merit consideration and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/.N,CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I \\-..

SECTION OFFICER To, 1.

2.

a The V Metropolitan M_agistrate at Medchal, Ranga Reddy District The Station House Officer, Alwal police StationlCvbera5ad One CC to Sri B.Sesi Bhushan Rao ,Advocate f OpUCt Two ccs to Public Prosecutor, High court for the State of relangana Hyderabad (our) Two CD Copies 4.

5.

ks AL{k

HIGH COURT DR.SA,J DATED:0510312021 IA 14:

o t '(i )oo 't 24 tlAB 2021

ORDER

-a AT * c dGRLP.No.3706 of 2013 DISMISSING THE CRL.P Q..v'

>t\v