B.Mamatha v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER rWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 37626 OF 202'l Between:
B.Mamatha, D/o B. Sudarashan Reddy (Late), Aged :S3-.years' Occ .School Asst 61.'tt'tl,'ilFuiscnoot, Seetnarampuram,'Khammamlu;, KhammamDistrict' ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telanqana , Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner and Director of School Education' Government of Telanglna,lst floor, C-Block, Saifabad, Hyderabad ' The District Educational Officer, Khammam, Khammam District' The District Educational officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pur, ,n order or direction or writ in the nature of mandamus duly declaring the action of the respondents in conducting the counselling process for allotting the caderes iportingr JnO"r G.O.Ms.No. 317 iated 06-12-2021 as per the circular memo vide No iossls-pr.llzo21-7 daied23-12-2021, without completing the proce-ss oIllsqo;1no oi uppri"rtion. of consider the spouse cases as per Memo vide No.
1655/5PF-l12021-5 daied 22-12_2021 as illegal ,ibitrury and against the principals of nat-ural justice and consequen y direct the respondents to dispose the application of the.petitioner ;;;k;;;;;t.e case, before proceedino wlth the.counselling under circular memo vide N6. 1 655/5pF-1 /20 21-7 , daled 23-12-2021 in the interest of the justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ine-Hign court may be pleased 1g-{9n_ot9 16" "ppfl"tion of the petitioner made as per Memo vide No.
1655/SPF-112021-5 daled 22'-12-2021 seeking spouse case' to direct the respondent to examine the Lpr*"ntution aatJa zs-lz-2021 of the petitioner on legally separated woman ;;;;;d; ;;J posted to Khammam District made bv him and to pending disposal of the above writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. RAMU NALLAMOTHU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SH'{VILI w.P .No.37 26 0F ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks perrrfssion to withdraw the writ petition u'ith liberry to the petitioner to fi e writ petition afresh'
Reservirg such liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. N o costs.
Miscellz neous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSIS'TANT REGISTRAR //rRUE CoPY, lt --, To, sEcTtoN oFFtcER
1. One CC to Sri. Rr,MU NALLAMOTHU ,Advocate [OpUC]
2. Two CCs to GP f rr SCHOOL EDUCATION ,Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana at HyC -.rabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
4. One Spare Copy.
Rsn GB
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212121 r,e, slA rt' o
ORDER
,^\t t::
c) 29 Jr:t?i'tt WP.No.37626 o12021 DISMISSING TI IE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COS TS I Rh