Maddi Tataiah Company v. Kakumanu Srinivasa Rao

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** CONTEMPT CASE No.1534 of 2015 Between:

Maddi Tataiah Company, Rep. by its PartnerLicence No.255, Agricultural Market Yard, Guntur.

... Petitioner/Appellant (s) and Kakumanu Srinivasa Rao, Guntur.

... Respondent (s) DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 06.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

Yes/No Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reports/Journals Yes/No Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

Yes/No HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1534 OF 2014 O R D E R:

When the matter is listed on 05.08.2015, under the caption 'For Orders', there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner in the morning session as well as in the evening session. Hence the matter was directed to be posted on 06.08.2015, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even when the matter is listed on 06.08.2015 none appeared for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. No

order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous applications, if any pending shall stand closed. No costs.

___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 06.08. 2015 t k