Shri Prabhudayal Agarwal v. The Incometax Officer, Ward-10 [1], Hyderabad
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:45 OF 2009 lncometaxTribunalAppealunderSection260-4ofthelncometaxAct,l96l' againsttheorderofthelncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,B-BENCH'Hyderabadin Misc.Appln'No'23of2009inlTANo.564/Hydi2003dated24-04-2009forthe assessmentyearlgg0-91preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissionerof lncome Tax (Appeals), Guntur CAMP at Hyderabad dated 3O-12-2002 in Appeal Nos 0059/Tr./ClT (A) GNT/2002-O3, OOSStTr'tClT (A) GNT/2002-03 '0057ffr' lCtT (A/GNT t2o)2-03, 0055iTr.iClT(A) GNT/2002-03' Between:
Shri Prabhudayal Aganrval' Secunderabad ...A''ELLANT AND The lncometax Officer, Ward -10 (1), Hyderabad "'RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. Y. KOTESWARA RAO, REPRESENTING SRI Y. RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE I{oN'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO INCOlvtlt TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.45 of 2OO9 JUDGMENT: (i>er the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. Y.l( rteswara Rao, iearned counsel representing Mr. Y.Ratnakiu', learned counsel for the appellant. 2.
Lea:ned counsel for the appellant submits that the issue involvec in this appeal does not survive for consideration on account of e fflr.x of time.
3.
The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
4.
A6,:ordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellan :ous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Howevr.r, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The lncome -t:rx Appellate Tribunal, B- BENCH, Hyderabad
2. The Commi:;sioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Guntur CAMP at Hyderabad
3. THE INCOM=IAX OFFICER, WARD-10 [1], HYDERABAD'
4. One CC to S;Fll. Y. RATNAKAR, Advocate [OPUCI
5. Two CD Copie s kut/gh
/ HIGH COURT DATED:2811112024 --'a::=::
,/ -- ):
'.) 'r.i l'
(.:.
ORDER
1 1 D[:I ir24 lTTA.No.45 of 200!) a DTSMISSING THE I'T fA AS INFRUCTUOTJS W