Chirumalla Bhanu Prakash v. Smt. Piyanka Reddy

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No:2546 0F 2023 ContemptCaseunderSectionsl0tol2ofContemptofCourtsActl9Tlto PunishtheRespondenthereinforwillfuldisobedienceoftheordersdated2S-09. 2022 in \N rit Petition No.376 50 of 2022'

Between:

Chirumalla Bhanu Prakash, S/o- Late Rajanna, Aged about 55 years' Occ: Business'R/o.BlockA,FlatNo.301,DyanushLakeFrontApartment' Manjeera Water Pipe Line Road, Afeezpet, Hyderabad' Telangana State - 500 050.

...Petitioner

AND Smt. Piyanka Reddy, The Joint Sub- Registrar, Ramagundam, Oio SubRegistrar at Peddapalli, Peddapalli District - 505172' ...Contemnor/ResPondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. VEERA SAVAN CHAKRAVARTHY DARA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER l

I R THE HON RI ,BLE S JUSTICE N.v.sHRAVAN KUMA Contempt Case No.25 46of 2023 ORDER:

This Contemp! case has been filed praying to punish the respondent herein for deiiberate and wilful disobedience of the orders passed by the Court rn W.P.No.3765 O of 2022 <lated 2B'A9'2022'

2.ThisCourthaspassedthefollowinginterimorder in W.P.No.35 670 of 2022 daLed 2B'Og 2022 as follows: " Notice before admtsson'

Learnecl counsel lor LLe petitioner IS to directed to take out personal nottce respondent Nos'6 to 18 and 7 br| Regtstered Post uith Acknowledgment Due and file proof of seruice inthe Registry'

Post on 14'10'2022'

In the mearuuthile ' the resPondent No.4 shalL consid-er the representation of the petitioners dated 10'06 2022 and take uith necessary action stictly in accordance latu."

3. When the matter rs taken up for hearing, learned ader lor Sr amps and Registra tion it stating that a document styled was presented before the Assistant Government ple has filed a counter affidav as "Canceliation Deed,, respondent by the third party to take action in the matter. It is further submitted that respondent has also furnished a suitable reply to the petitioner uid.eNo.I6l of 2023 dated, 22.11.202s

4. The grievance of the petitioner is has no power to cancei a document that registered as Doc.No. 132/2022 under Registration Act, 190g, on a mere that Department has already been the provisions of representation made by a third party who is not connected to the document already registered. He would further submit that no document styled as tancellation deed, was presented as on the date.

5. per contra, learned Assistant Government pieader would submit that the respondents has already given a reply to the.petition,efrvide File No. 161 of 2O23and wouid thereford,submit that t [* __ rrders of this Court in W.p.No.3765O I i

J of 2022 dated 28.09.2022 has been complied with and prays to close the contempt case.

6. At this, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be granted liberty to challenge the Ietter in Lr.No.161l2023 dated 22.11.2023 issued by the re spondent.

7. In view of the same, since the remedy is available to the petitioner to question the letter dated 22.11.2023 in the pending writ petition, this Contempt Case stands closed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the letter dated 22 .I I .2023 , if he is still aggrieved.

8. Recording the above said submissions, contempt case stalds closed.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. However there s all be no order as to costs. sd/- Ch.Venkateswarlu //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY GIST To, SECTION OFFICER One CC to Sri. VEERA SAVAN CHAKRAVARTHY DARA, Advocate tOpUCJ Iu',.Ti:?",ff"fflo"r1'"t AND REGrsrRAroN ,Hish courr ror the Two CD Copies \k J PSR

HIGH COURT ;1.':k,ki+ '' " .i::i '

DATED:2911212023 't_.,. ,.

r-)1"

'(' ,-:

o O 2 0 ilrH lilZ.f ()

ORDER

CC.No.2546 of 2023 c CLOSING THE CONTEMTP CASE.