Lakkakula Raju v. K.Yadagir And ANR

[ 3215 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI MOTOR ACCIDENT CIV L MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1203 OF 2010 Appeal filed Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against ttre Order and decree in M.V.O.P.No.1934 of 2005 dated.12-O2-2$07 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Warangal.

Betvyeen:

Lakkakula Raju, S/oMallaiah, Occ: Chicken Centre Business R/o.Kapuwada, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

...AppellanUPetitioner AND KYadagir, S/o.Veeraswamy Auto Owner Rlo.1 -277, P aidipally, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

2. The New lndia Assurance Company Limited, rep by its Divisional Manager O/o.Hotel Madhu Complex, Hanamkonda, Warangil District.

...Respondents/Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant : SRI C A R SESHAGIRI RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: __ The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT \

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI M.A.C.M.A. No. 1203 of2010 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the appellant - petitioner against the order and decree dated 17.02-2007 passed in M'V'O'P' No 1934 of 2005 by III Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal, Warangal'

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing toda1" there is no representation by the learned counsel for the appellant' Even on the earlieroccasionsi-e.25.02-2021,04'06'202land23'07'202lalsonone appeared for the appellant. Hence, it appears that the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter'

3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution' No order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' SD/. P PADMANABHA REODY'

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, l.TheMotorAccidentClaimsTribunalWarangal(Withrecords'ifany)

2. OneCC to SRI C A R SESHAGIRI RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies ADK oy

Ip

I I HIGH COURT DATED:0811212023 thilL.rrA r€

JUDGMENT

,< ( MACMA.No.1203 of 2010 18 iln m zo oo .l t EsparcH gO * i T j*l DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS 6,151.*r I