Sri.Anoop Anthony, S/O.John D Souza v. State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.1280 of 2015 in Crl.P.No.1170 of 2015 and Criminal Petition No.1170 of 2015 COMMON ORDER:

De-facto complainant and her counsel Sri B.Preetam Singh are present. Accused Nos.1 and 2 and their counsel Sri Thakur singh are present.

On the report given by defacto complainant the police of C C S , Hyderabad registered Cr.No.10 of 2014 against the accused for the offences under Sections 498A IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and investigation is reported to be pending.

At this stage, parties appeared along with their counsel and submitted that at the intervention of elders and well-wishers they have amicably resolved their disputes and decided to live peacefully and happily and in view of it, the defacto complainant has no objection for quashment of proceedings in Cr.No.10 of 2014 and therefore, permission may be accorded to them to compound the offence and quash the proceedings in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above submission and in view of the fact that it is a matrimonial matter wherein parties have amicably resolved their disputes and willing to lead happy and harmonious life and no useful purpose will be served in allowing the investigation to be continued, and following the decision reported

in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC

303) this petition is allowed and permission is accorded to the parties to compound the offence and compromise is recorded in terms of joint memo filed by both the parties and consequently proceedings in Cr.No.10 of 2014 on the file of CCS, Hyderabad are hereby quashed.

In the result, the petitions are accordingly allowed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 27.02.2015 Murthy