Sunitha Devi Yerram, v. The State Of Telangana,
[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30307 OF 2024 Between:
Sunitha Devi Yerram, Wo Amith Kumar Mogili, Age 41 Yrs, Occ; Pvt Employee, 2-37O3lBl2l23lN1 , Sai Colony, Thiruma Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. .....PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Hyderabad.
2. The Narsingi Municipality, Narsingi, Rangareddy Dist.Rep by its tvlunicipal Commissioner .
3. THE HYDERABAD DISASTER RESPONSE AND ASSETS PROTECTION AGENCY (HYDRAA), represented by its Commissioner, having its office at Othand 7th floor, Buddha Bhavan, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad-500003. RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hlgh Court may be pleased to grant a Writ Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to interfere and disturb the existing physical features /semi constructed commercial building by demolishing the same on the Petitioners land ie land in Survey Nos 223 AA,Door No.5-5/'1 , Sai Tulasi enclave-lll admeasuring'1083 Sq.Yds or 905.38 Sq.
,/ over the subject land i e Survey Nos 223 AA ,Door No.5-5/1, Sai Tulasi enclave-lll admeasuringl0S3 Sq.Yds or 905.38 Sq.Mts at Vattinagula pally Village Gandipet Mandal ,Nasingi tVunicipality, Rangareddy Dist including but not limited to disturbing the existing physical features in any manner whatsoever existing thereon.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2024 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner whatsoever in the ownership physical possession/semi finished building and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject land i e land in Survey Nos.223 AA ,Door No.5-5/1, Sai Tutasi enclave-lll admeasuringl0B3 Sq.Yds or 905.38 Sq.mts Vattinagulapally Village Gandipet Mandal, Nasingi Municipality, Rangareddy Distpending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI JANARDHANA REDDy pONAKA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI G.MALLA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI K.RAVINDER REDDy The Court made the following ORDER
:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.3O3O7 of 2024 ORDER:
After arguing for some time Sri Janardhan Reddy Ponaka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.
2.
Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 4.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
/ SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADIVN AND URBAN DEVELOPIT/ENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUf] One CC to SRI JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA, Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRI K.RAVINDER REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to SRI G.MALLA REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies SA GJP w
/ ,'
HIGH COURT DATED:2911012024
ORDER
WP.No.30307 of 2024 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
."fd &, I