Gurappu Kishen Chand, v. The Governement Of Andhra Pradesh

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.31907 OF 2013 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: " For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus direct the respondent No. 1 to cause enquiry with regard to the interference of the respondent No. 2 in calling the petitioner regularly to the police station and pressurising the petitioner to settle the issue with the respondents 3 and 4 as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and exceeding the powers vested with him and also voilative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to pressurise the petitioner to settle the issue with the respondents 3 and 4 and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances." 3.

Learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 placed on record the written instructions dated 11.11.2013 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Saroornagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. Perusal of the said written instructions would indicate that no complaint or case whatsoever was received or registered against the petitioner on the file of the Police Station, Saroornagar. From the perusal of the affidavit it is evident that there are disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 with regard to business transactions for which the respondent-police have nothing to do with it. The respondentpolice never seen the petitioner nor summoned him to the police station till the date of issuance of the written instructions. The allegation that the respondent-police is harassing the petitioner by summoning him to the police station is absolutely false. It is also

specifically mentioned that the respondent-police never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4.

4.

Taking the above said statement into consideration, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. ___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J Date: 16.09.2019.

ccm

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.31907 OF 2013 Date:16.09.2019 ccm