K. Jayalaxmi, v. K. Subrahmanyam,
[ 3208 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO: 386 OF 201'l Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 04.02.2011 made in A.S. No. 138 of 2008, on the file of the Court of the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, Preferred against the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S. No. 4865 of 2004 Dated 20.02.2008 On the file of the Court of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:
K. Jayalaxmi, Wo. Sri K. Shanker, Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No C-6, Block B, First Floor, H.No. 16-9-911, Malakpet, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND
1. K. Subrahmanyam, S/o. A.V. Rao, Occ: Govt. Servant, R/o. 16-1 1-5111D1245, SBH Colony, Moosarambagh, Hyderabad.
2- Sri Dr. Smt. Ezhilarasi, Wo. Dr. Dharmarajulu, Occ:Doctor, R/o. 16-1 1511 lDl245,SBH Colony, Moosarambagh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPON DENTS/PLAINTIFFS : SRI. VENKAT RAGHU RAMULU (NP) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondents : SRI S. A. V. SAI KUMAR The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SMT 'USTICE P. SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO. 386 oF 2011 JUDGMENT:
Plaintiffs filed O.S.No.4B65 of 2004 on the file of XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for recovery of possession. The trial Couft partly decreed the suit. The unsuccessful defendant preferred appeal vide A.S.No.138 of 2008 wherein the appellate Court had dismissed the appeal, against which the second appeal has been filed.
2.
On 12.10.2023, learned counsel for the appellant stated that the matter would be infructuous and sought time for confirmation with the client. Today, there is no representation for the appellant and it seems that learned counsel for the appellant has no interest to pursue the litigation. No purpose would be served in continuing the second appeal.
3.
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad
2. The XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad
3. One CC to SRI VENKAT RAGHU RAMULU Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI S A V. SAI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] _ s rwo cB*.QryeA Y.9'
HIGH COURT DATED:0611112023
JUDGMENT
SA.No.386 of 2011 rai .:,, l i .) / i rr)A-i :::a5'
".r'
,/ i Dc QVr-h'
..\f '
T DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION