Sukhdev Singh v. The State Of Telangana Rep By Its Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ******** WRIT PETITION NO.13539 of 2015 Between:

Sukhdev Singh s/o.Ajit Singh, Aged 72 years, Occu: Retired RBI Employee, R/o.H.no.7-4-40/1-B, Ferozguda, Balanagar, Kukatpalli, Ranga Reddy District and another.

.. Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED : 06.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may : Yes / No Be allowed to see the Judgments ? :

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked: Yes / No to Law Reporters/Journals :

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair : Yes / No Copy of the Judgment ? :

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.13539 of 2015 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not taking action against the illegal construction being undertaken by the respondent 5 and 6 in plot No.17 in Sy.No.8, Ferozguda, Kukatpally Municipality, GHMC, Circle-14, Hyderabad, pursuant to their complaints as illegal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and learned standing counsel for GHMC and with their consent the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

3. Petitioners claim to be owners and possessors of plot No.16 in Survey No.8, situated at Ferozguda, Kukatpally Municipality, GHMC Circle-14, Hyderabad and their sole grievance is that respondents 5 and 6, who are their neighbors, are undertaking construction of building against the sanctioned plan without leaving the setbacks. Petitioners stated to have submitted representations to respondent GHMC authorities dated 09.05.2014, 12.05.2014, 14,05.2014, 19.05.2014 and 23.05.2014 and allege that no action is taken thereon and the same are pending.

4. When the matter is taken up, both counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to expeditiously dispose of the complaints of the petitioners.

5. Having regard to the same, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, writ petition is disposed of directing the

respondent No.3 to consider the complaints of the petitioners dated 09.05.2014, 12.05.2014, 14,05.2014, 19.05.2014 and 23.05.2014 and after affording reasonable opportunity to respondents 5 and 6, pass appropriate orders as warranted under law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision to the petitioners. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date : 06.08.2015 kkm

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.13539 of 2015 Date :06.08.2015 kkm