Katta Venkateswarlu v. Narasimha Rao,

[ 3303 ] lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No: 2347 ot 2O24 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for wantonly, deliberately and willful disobedience in compliance of the order dated 11-06-2024 passed in W.P.No.28047 of 2015. Between:

Kafta Venkateswarlu, S/o. Janaiah, Age: 74 years, Occ: Cultivation R/o. H.No.728-202, Rajiv Gruhakalpa Colony, Polepally Village, Khammam Rural Mandal, Khammam District.

...PetitionerMrit Petitioner

AND

1. Narasimha Rao, Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Revenue Division, Khammam.

2. Ram Prasad, Tahsildar, Khammam Rural Mandal, Khammam District. (Cause Title/names amended as per the Court Order dated.10-01-2025 in lA No.1 of 2024 in CC.No.2347 ot 2024)

...Respondents/Respondents 3 & 4

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M.Achyuth Reddy, representing Sri V. Erahmaiah Chowdary Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. Swetcha, Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTI/AS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2347 of 2o24 ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed invoking the provisions under Sections 1 0 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.28047 of 2015, dated 1L.O6.2O24.

2.

Heard Sri M.Achyuth Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri V.Brahmaiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Srvetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

3.

During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 11.06.2024, I I respondent No.2 considered the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 12.03.2015 and passed speaking orders vide proceedings Rc.No.C/ 1416/2024, dated OI.ll.2O24 and a copy of the speaking order was

.) communicated to the petitioner through registered post. A copy of the said speaking order is placed on record, b51 duly serving upon tJle learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.

In view of the compliance of the order passed by this Court on 11.06.2024, no further adjudication is required. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the remedies as available under law, including questioning the speaking order dated Ol.lL.2O24 issued by respondent No.2.

5.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPU REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY/I CTION OFFICER \ To, 't. One CC to Sri V. Brahmaiah Chowdary' Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to covernment Pleader for Revenue, Hidh Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies Kam/gh G.

fF-

I I HIGH COURT DATED:1010112025 rHE Sfr\f\( -.1 )A ( ( J o 2 5 rtB 2025

ORDER

t )F-.-7r1,'.*€f'

.a:-!-::ir'

CC.No.2347 of 2024 THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED \ { \>