Dr. Padmalatha v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.28381 of 2018 O R D E R:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Saleem, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipality. 2.

When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that for reddressal of the grievance petitioner herein submitted a representation on 20.05.2018 to the Commissioner, Proddatur Municipality/second respondent herein and no action has been taken despite lapse of considerable length of time. 3.

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipality that if any such representation is filed before the second respondent herein, the same will be verified and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. 4.

Recording the said submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent herein to verify the representation dated 20.05.2018 said to have been filed by the petitioner herein and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Till such consideration of the said representation, there shall be no coercive action against the subject constructions. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date:09.08.2018 grk

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.28381 of 2018 Dated: 09.08.2018 grk