High Court for State of TelanganaWA/1038/2016dismissed no costs

R.V.S.N.V.P.Sarnna, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2017-11-133 pages

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO + W.A.NO.1038 of 2016 % Date: 13-11-2017 # Betw een:

R.V.S.N.V.P. Sarma, S/o. Subba Rao Sarma, Former Junior Assistant and Non-Technical Maistry, Sri Venkateswara Swamy Devasthanam, Dwaraka Tirumala, West Godavari District.

..... Appellant And

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, A.P. Tilak Road, Ram Koti, Hyderabad - 500 001.

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Venkateswara Swamy Devasthanam, Dwaraka Tirumala, West Godavari District.

.... Respondents ! Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Mangena Sree Rama Rao ^ Counsel for Respondent No.1 : G.P. for Endowments ^ Counsel for Respondent No.2 & 3 : Mrs. K. Lalitha.

< GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

VRS,J & MGR,J.

W.A.No.1038/2016 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO WRI T APPEAL No.1038 of 2016 JUDGMENT: (Per VRS,J) Aggrieved by an order passed by the learned Judge in a writ petition filed by him, seeking reinstatement into service after revocation of suspension, the writ petitioner has come up with the above writ appeal.

2. Heard Mr. M. Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the appellant.

3. It is found from the penultimate paragraph of the order of the learned Judge that the order of the learned Judge was passed with the consent of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. We do not know whether it is correct or incorrect. But in any case, if an order states that it was passed on the consent of the counsel for the petitioner, the same person cannot challenge the said order by way of an appeal.

4. Therefore, leaving it open to him to work out other remedies, available under law, this writ appeal is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ appeal, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

_______________ M. GANGA RAO, J.

13th November, 2017 Js.

VRS,J & MGR,J.

W.A.No.1038/2016 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO WRI T APPEAL No.1038 of 2016 13th November, 2017 Js.