M/S. Nandan Biomatrix Limited v. Herbz India And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IVIONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 255 OF 2012 Appeal filed Under Section 37(1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 'l996againsttheorderanddecreedated31-03-201 1inArb.O.P.No.968of 2OO7on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between:

M/s. NANDAN BIOIVAIRIX Lll\4lTED, a Company incorporated under the Provsions of the Companies Act 1956, having its registered Office at 8-2120188 and 89, Aparna Crest, llnd Floor, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034 ...Appellant AND 'l . HERBZ lNDlA, Having its Office at FCC Building, Movoor Road, Kozhikode (Calicut) Kerala

2. John Carmelo Nidhiri, S/o John Nidhiri R/o. Nidhir, Toch School Road, Vyttila, Cochin - 682019, Kerala

3. Hon'ble Arbitrator Sri M.Krishna Rao,, Advocate (Sole Arbitrator) R/o. H.No. 1 6-2-7 42 I A205, Yamuna Towrs, Usmangad, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ...respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. T. BALA MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri. K.K. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&3: None Appeared The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.255 OF 2OL2 JIIDGMENT:

When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that this matter has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission of learned counsel for the appeilant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infruc[uous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand ciosed ,ffRUE COPY// ., tt-"H's,t*t*=ouJ $/- SECTION OFFICER To, The Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (wrth records' rf any) 1.

One CC to SRI T BALA MOHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUCI z.

One CC to SRI K K DURGA PRASAD Advocate IOPUCI Two CD CoPtes t$t PSR

HIGH COURT ( DATED:1 111212023

JUDGMENT

,. :. .:.

t\ 1J fri,t 2ir.4 CMA.No.255 of 2012 $'-r DISMISSING THE CMA AS INFRUCUTUOS WITHOUT COSTS.

0r$d