← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/16806/2009dismissed as infructuous

Mohd. Wahab Khan, v. The District Collector,

2023-11-29J Sreenivas Rao4 pages

[ 33031 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16806 OF 2009 Between:

1. Mohd. Wahab Khan, S/o. Late Mohd. Afzal Khan, Aged about 29 Business, Rl/o. H.No. 6-1-358, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad.

2. Mohd. Habeeb Khan, Sio. Late Mohd. Afzal Khan, Aged about 27 Business, Rl/o. H.No. 6-1-358, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad. years years AND ...PETITIONERS 1 . The District Collector, Hyderabad District.

2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Secunderabad District.

3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Assn.POT) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

4. Old Grave yeard, D.No. 6-3-356, Bokkulugda(old) , New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad, rep by its Muthvali Janab Sami Ateeq Ahmed, S/o Janab Sardar Ahmed.

(R4 is impleaded as per C.O. dated 2311212010 in WPMP 36547/2009) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of lVlandamus or any other writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the petitioners property to an extent of 660 Sw. yds. in Survey No. 15, bearing H.NO. 6-3-356/6, Bholakpur, Village, New Bhoiguda, Bokkalaguda, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners property l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 22065 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property to an extent of 660 sq. yds. in survey No. 15, bearing H.NO. 6-3-356/6, Bholakpur, Village, New Bhoiguda, Bokkalaguda, Secunderabad, pending the disposal of the Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. MADHAVA RAO REp SRI P. R. K. AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI R. CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

-7 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITIoN No.168O6 of 2OO9 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Madhava Rao, learned counsel representing Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, Iearned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR V SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, .l.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana,at Hvderabad [OUT] ij'";"ad 6 sa h. n K. ATvIERANDRA KpV4.B Advocate Lqty.ql . 5# 66 i" sni.n. CHnr.roCn sHEKAR REDDY, Advocate [oPUC] . Two CD CoPies BM GJ 5rts

HIGH COURT DATED:2911112023 1 HE STA Iq q f, zo -t,

ORDER

[ 4 JAN 2024 WP.No.16806 of 2009 t iS l, i'.i 1,1 .- * .tt \j [ -''. -jr'

I) DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 2a's