Gannaboina Shasidhar, v. State Of Telangana. Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

[ 32ee ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 18142 OF 2015 Between:

Gannaboina Shasidhar, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 29 years, Occ: S.l- of Police, Langer House Police Station, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND State of Telangana. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, For Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The Superintendent of Police, Medak District at Sangareddy, The Station House Officer, Siddipet lTown Police Station, Medak District. Ambati Sudhakar Goud, S/o. late Satyanarayana, Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. Narsaipalli Village, Maddur Mandal, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Crime No.154122015 of I Town Police Station, Siddipet, Medak District and lhe same may be quashed declaring the action of the 3'd respondent in registering the FIR is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and lndian Penal Code.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 23445 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in Crime No.154/2015 of lTown Police Station, Siddipet, Medak District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner:Ms. TANU SRI APPEARING FOR SRI T PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR REPRESENTING FOR GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.4:NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.18142 OF 2015 I I ORDER:

Ms. Tanu Sri, appearing on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, no further orders are required and hence seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous.

Mr. Vizarath AIi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of learned Government Pleader for Home for respondents No.1 to 3 is present and takes no objection to the SAITIC Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present writ petition as infructuous.

SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Redd

2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for t Hyderabad [OUTI

3. Two CD Copies , Advocate [OPUC] e State of Telangana, at v h TJ GJP

I , HIGH COURT DATED:2210112024

ORDER

WP.No.18142 ot 2015 ltlE s 14 16:

o ( e.

+ Jc 0 7 tlAH 2|124 Lo ,J * .OeSPATC.\ED * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

6t"1"t 2?

*