← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/3078/2017dismissed as infructuous

G.Man Mohan Krishna v. The Government Of Telangana Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

2022-12-15N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

/ [325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD THURSDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 3078 OF 2017 Between:

G.Man Mohan Krishna, Wo.Venkatesham, Aged about 45 years, Working as Senior Assistant. Warangal Municipal Corporation, R:/o. Bheernararn, Near T.V.Tower, Hanmakonda, Warangal District.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The Government of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad 2- The Warangal Municipal Corporation rep. by its Commissioner,, Warangal

3. The Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal.,

4. The Additional Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directto call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned order issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings Roc.No. C1128835/2013-14 dated 21-8-2014 imposing the punishment of censure and quash or set aside the same as being arbitrary, illegal, perverse, opposed to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the statutory mandate of Rules 20 and 21 of the APCS (CC&A) Rules 1991 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4lo regularize the suspension period from 24-8-2013 to 5-3-2O14 as on duty for all purposes, including pay, increments, allowances etc.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D. LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION flR) No.3078 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/. I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISfRAR I ,..,,, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . Two CCs to cP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One CC to SRl. D. LINGA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD copies BM KKSw

\ HIGH COURT DATED:1 511212022 L4 "r,4"

t'

,- Ig .t':

\ -.,$ tss ri"l N \ 9.

ORDER

WP(TR).No.3078 of 2017 DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PET|T|ON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @q* l.

q v,