Shabaz Ahmed Khan, v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12947 of 2025 This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.6 in FIR No.215 of 2025 of Parigi Police Station, Vikarabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 132, 281, 61(2) of BNS and Section 27(2) of Arms Act, 1959. 2.
The brief facts of the case are that, on 28.07.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that he along with ASI were performing vehicle checking at Sulthanpur village gate and they found three persons were proceeding to Sulthanpur village from Parigi village, due to that the complainant and men were tried to stop the said vehicle, but the rider of motorcycle did not stopped and he drove his vehicle in rash, after some distance they stopped the said vehicle, while the complaint and staff were trying to search them, they fled away from there by leaving their motor cycle, in the process a country made weapon has fell down. After searching motor cycle, they was found a bag carrying 1. Three rain courts, 2. two towels, 3. One Screw driver, 4. One long iron rod, 5. One pair of hand gloves, 6. Two sharp iron
rod with wooden holders and 7. One pair of country made ammunition was found appearing as they were on a verge to commit an offence. For which the complainant requested to take necessary action against the said un-known offender who are discharge of their duties and drove their vehicle in rash. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences.
3.
Heard Sri M.A. Qavi Abbasi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/accused No.6 as well as Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences and there is no specific role or overt act has been attributed against him and he is a pillion rider and he is in jail from 06.09.2025. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations leveled against him are serious in nature. It is further submitted that they are going
to commit dacoity in the said premises and there is no previous criminal history against him. As such, he is not entitled for bail. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner is in jail from 06.09.2025 and there is no previous criminal history against him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner/accused No.6, subject to the following conditions.
i.
The petitioner/ accused No.6 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Session Judge, Vikarabad District, Telangana.
ii.
The petitioner/ accused No.6 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/ accused No.6 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 15.10.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12947 of 2025 Date:15.10.2025 TU