High Court for State of TelanganaWA/504/2016disposed of no costs

Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, v. G.B. Nagesh Kumar,

2016-06-29Dilip B. Bhosale,P Naveen Rao3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO Writ Appeal No. 504 of 2016 Date: 29.06.2016 Between:

Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Represented by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi.

... Appellant And G.B. Nagesh Kumar, Tirupathi and another.

... Respondents

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO Writ Appeal No. 504 of 2016 PC: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard Ms. K. Lalitha, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Venkatarami Reddy, learned Government Pleader for respondent No.2.

This writ appeal is directed against an interlocutory order dated 15.6.2016 in Writ Petition No. 18673 of 2016, whereby learned Single Judge, while issuing notice, allowed respondent No.1, i.e., writ petitioner and his family members to avail the benefit of Arjita Seva on 17.6.2016, pursuant to the booking made by him on 31.8.2001 under ticket Nos. 432515/01 and 432515/01.

We are informed by learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant that the writ petitioner and his family members were allowed to perform Arjita Seva as per his booking on 17.6.2016. In view thereof, when we expressed that nothing survives in the writ appeal, she submitted that, in view of the observations made by learned Single Judge in the impugned order, other similarly placed persons are likely to get benefit of the same and hence, it may be observed that this order shall not form a precedent, allowing the appellant to move learned

Single Judge for expeditious hearing of the writ petition. Having regard to the contentions urged on behalf of the appellant and having considered that the writ petitioner has already performed the Pooja, we dispose of this writ appeal observing that the impugned order shall not form a precedent, subject to outcome of the writ petition. It is open for the appellant to apply for expeditious hearing of the writ petition before learned Single Judge.

With these observations, the writ appeal is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

__________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ ________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 29.06.2016 pnb