Jangam Tanesha,Tanesha Kumar,Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9634OF 2022 Between:
Jangam Tanesha @ Tanesha Kumar @ Ashok Kumar, S/o. Venkata Subba Rao, Aged about 72 years, Occ. Constable, F/o. Bhagathsingh Nagar, Suryapet Town, Suryapet Diskict Petitioner/Accused AND 1 . The State Judicature aof Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of t Hyderabad Through SHO, Penpahad, Suryapet District
2. Bittu Veera Bhadraiah, S/o. Bixamaiah, Aged 46 years, Occ. Agricultural, R./o. Dupahad Village, Penpahad Mandal, Suryapet District ... Respondents/Petitioner Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Petitioner/Accused from the above case in C.C.No.$ O of 2020 on the flle of the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge at Suryapet in Crime No.70/2014 for the offence U/s 406 and 42O of lPC. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance in in C.C.No.84O ot 2O2O on the file of the Hon'ble Additional junior Civil Judge at Suryapet in Crime No.70/2014 for the offence U/s 406 and 42O ot lPC, pending disposal of CRLP 9634 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.
The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Rapolu Bhaskar Advocate for the Petitione(s), Asst. Public Prosecutor (TG) Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. WSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9634 ef2o22 ORDDR:
The present Criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in C.C.No.g4O of 2O2O on the file of the Additional Junior Civil, Judge, Suryapet District. 2.
No representation on petitioner,s side on call. 3.
On the other hand, learned Assistant public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the case ended in acquittal and therefore, the Criminal petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if arry, sha-ll stand closed.
Sd/. N.SRIHARI //TRUE COpy// AsslsTANT DEGTSTRAR ro, secnJtdncen '1. The Addl. Junior Civil Judge, at Suryapet.
2. The Station House Officer, penpahad police Station, Suryapet District.
3. One CC to Sri. Rapotu Bhaskar Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] CHP u. Two cD copies.
Y]R
t { HIGH COURT DATED:1410212024
ORDER
CRLP.No.9634 of 2022 lHI S14 R a o ( 1) zo 10 APB 2021 * * Sp,:.rCHEO € DISMISSING OF THE CRL.P.
AS INFRUCTUOUS @**,f