← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/38900/2012allowed no costs

K. Siddappa, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

2015-06-11C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.38900 OF 2012 DATED:11-6-2015 Between:

K. Siddappa ... Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer Penukonda Mandal Anantapur district and another ... Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. S.V. Ramana COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: A.G.P. for Civil Supplies (AP) THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the order in Rc.No.547/2011, dt.10.12.2012, of respondent No.2, whereby he has suspended the petitioner's fair price shop authorization. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP) fairly conceded that in view of amendment of the second proviso of clause 5(7) of the Andhra Pradesh State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 with effect from 17.9.2012, respondent No.2 has no jurisdiction to pass the impugned order.

In view of the same, the impugned order is quashed and the writ petition is accordingly allowed.

As to sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P. No.49352 of 2012 and W.V.M.P. No.804 of 2013 shall stand disposed of as infructuous. _______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11-6-2015 bnr