High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/3097/2015disposed of no costs

V. Sundar Raja v. V. Padmavathi

2015-12-11Raja Elango2 pages

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C.No.3097 of 2015

ORDER

The present criminal revision case is directed against the order dated 14.10.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.764 of 2015 in M.C.No.210 of 2015 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Casecum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard both sides.

3. During the pendency of M.C.No.210 of 2015, respondents 1 to 3 being the wife and sons of petitioner filed Crl.M.P.764 of 2015 claiming interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.15,000/-per month each payable by the petitioner. The trial Court after considering the monthly salary of the petitioner at Rs.25,000/-per month as an employee in TV 5 Institution, granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/-per month to the first respondent and Rs.7,500/- per month each to second and third respondents from the date of the petition till disposal of the maintenance case. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present revision.

4. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The trial Court, after taking the various circumstances into consideration, granted the said interim maintenance to respondents 1 to 3. Apparently, the order impugned is an interim in nature. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, the trial Court is directed to dispose of M.C.No.210 of 2015

within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month to the first respondent and Rs.3,000/-per month each to the second and third respondents towards interim maintenance on or before 10th of every succeeding month. The petitioner is further directed to pay the arrears, if any, to respondents 1 to 3 calculating at the rate fixed by this Court in three equal monthly installments commencing from the month of January, 2016. The payments, if any made, have to be adjusted accordingly. The trial Court shall dispose of the said M.C. on merits without being influenced by the observations of this Court.

5. With the above said modification of the impugned order, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this revision, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 11th December, 2015 sj