Madhu Biotech, v. The State Of Telangana,

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY , THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WP 715 of 2015 Between:

Madhu Biotech, Rep. by its Proprietor, Tedla Madhusudhana Rao, S/o Thirupathaiah, aged 43 years, Plot No.16, RTC Supervisors Colony, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B. Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

.....RESPONDENT(S) WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through its Advocate Sri D.L.PANDU presented this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed here in the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the marketing of the petitioner's bio-products viz. (1) Biocid-G Humicacid Granules (2) Humi Tech - Humicacid Liquid,

(3) Biosafe - Fungicide (4) Leader - Nitrobenzine (5) Confident - Sucking pest, mites and thrips (6) MahaRani - Stem & Leaf Folder (7) Monarch - Pest & Mites and (8) Champion - Organic Bacterial Protector as illegal, arbitrary, un-constitutional and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondent not to interfere with any manner in the marketing and sale of the petitioner's bio-products under the Insecticides Act 1968 and Fertilizers Control (Order) Act 1985; AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D.L.PANDU, Advocate for the Petitioner and directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein returnable in two weeks to show cause as to why this writ petition should not be admitted in the

circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed in Writ Petition;

You viz ;

1 The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B. Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this writ petition should not be admitted. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:

Notice before admission, returnable in two weeks. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B. Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

(Addresses Nos.1 AND 2 BY RPAD ALONG WITH A COPY OF PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT).

3 Two CCs to G.P for Agriculture (Telangana), High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad (OUT).

4 One CC to SRI D.L.PANDU, Advocate (OPUC). 5 One Spare Copy.

KGK

HIGH COURT RKR J

ORDER

DATED: 22-01-2015

WP NO. 715 OF 2015 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION HIGH COURT DRAFTED BY: KGK DATED OF DRAFTING: 23-01-2015 RKR J

ORDER

DATED: 22-01-2015 WP NO. 715 OF 2015 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION