← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/13557/2024allowed no costs

Suraj Biswas v. The State Of Telangana

2024-11-13K. Sujana5 pages

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13557 of 2024 ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.11 in Crime No.246 of 2024 of Kagaznagar Town Police Station, Asifabad District, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that on 14.10.2024, at 00:30 hrs, MD. Fayaz lodged a complaint at Kaghaznagar Police Station, stating that his juice center workers were assaulted and abused by a group of individuals during a Durgamata Idol immersion procession on 13.10.2024, around 20:00 hrs. The attackers, including Kanna, Sai Vivek, and others, later went to Fayaz's juice shop, damaged it, and robbed Rs. 36,000/- after beating his brother Riyaz. Basing on the said complaint, the Police registered a case in Crime No.246 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 189(2), 191(2), 118(1), 324(4), 109, 310(2) read with 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023.

3.

Heard Sri S.

Surender Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Syed Yasar Manoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner seek bail stating that the complaint and remand report lack specific allegations against him, and he was falsely implicated for statistical purposes and at the behest of the opposing group. He further submitted that the investigation is completed, and all the material witnesses were examined, and further detention of the petitioner is unnecessary. He contended that the petitioner have been in judicial custody since 14.10.2024, causing undue hardship to their families. The allegations are false and fabricated. The petitioners are residents of Kagaznagar, Kumurambeem Asifabad District, with movable and immovable properties, and are willing to furnish sureties as directed. He further contended that previously, bail application the petitioner, vide Crl.M.P.No.258 of 2024, was dismissed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Asifabad, on 04.11.2024, without valid

reasons. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that there are other cases pending against some of the petitioner therefore, granting bail to him, at this stage, does not arise. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

After considering submissions from both the learned counsel and reviewing the record, despite allegations of attempted harm, the report of the Additional Public Prosecutor reveals that the de facto complainant sustained simple injuries, and further treatment is ongoing for L.W.3. Given the substantial completion of investigation and absence of criminal antecedents against the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the

satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sirpur Town, Kumurambheem Asifabad District.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 13.11.2024 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13557 of 2024 Date: 13.11.2024 SAI