Najeebuddin Ghalib v. The A.P. State Wakf Board, Rep. By Its Chief Executive

[ 3256 J HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TVVENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Between:

Najeebuddin Ghalib, S/o. Late Shamsuddin Galib, aged 51 years, Occ: Land Lord, Rlo.42-736/A, MussallamJung colony, Moulali, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad & 19-2-23, Maqbara Ghalib Jung, Misiri Gunj, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND .

1. The A.P. State Wakf Board, rep. by its Chief Executive, Officer, Opp: Public Gardens, Nampally Road, Hyderabad.

2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Nampally Station Road' Hyderabad-s,' 001 ..RE',.NDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inclusion of Masjid Muslim Jung, land in Sy.No.35Bl1,35812 & 358/3 along with 8 Mulgies and one double storied building, one kotha 5 tamarind Trees as Wakf at Serial No.2681, Page No.171 of A.P. Gazettee Supplemental Part ll dated 9.2.1989 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, without jurisdiction, null and void; and consequently direct the 1st respondent to delete above Gazette Notification.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 37835 OF 2008) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of A.P. Gazettee Supplemental Part ll with respect to serial No.2681, Page No.171 of dated 9.2.1989 by awarding costs, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI.MOHD ILYAS Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI.ABU AKRAM CounSel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI.FARHAN AZAM KHAN The Court made the following ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR No ORDER:

This matter was listed earlier on L6.o2.2o2a and as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption .for dismissal,. 2.

Today when the matter is listed under the caption .for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner either in the morning session or in the afternoon session. 3.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, this writ petition shall stand dismissed.

1n SD/.C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GD SECTION OFFICER I //TRUE COPY// I i To

1. One CC to SRI.MOHD ILYAS, Advocate [OPUCI

2. . One CC to SRT.FARHAN AZAM KHAN, Advocate [OPUCI

3. One CC to SRI.ABU AKRAM, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies i \ SA BS "\->f / j I l

I I HIGH COURT DATED:01 10312023 i\ sl Al-€ o'

r:

.,rl o 13 [?n ?[2i :. "'

i)i

ORDER

WP.No.28925 of 2008 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON . PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS, L v7