S.Yadamma, W/O. S.Pentaiah, v. The General Manager (Operations),

[ 3167 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 28681 OF 2013 Between:

, State Bank of Hyderabad, H.No. 8-1-87 141611, Hakeempet, S.Yadamma, Wo. S.Pentaiah, Occ: Sweeper Kakatiyanagar Branch, Hyderabad-S00 006. R/o. Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

,..PETITIONER AND

1. The General Manager (Operations), State Bank of Hyderabad, Head Office, Gun foundry, Hyderabad500 001.

2. The Assistdnt General Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Region-ll, Zonal Office, Secunderabad.

3. The General Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Kakatiyanagar Branch, HYderabad'

...RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of petitioner for absorbing her into regular service as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner service into regular service with all consequential benefits.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidaVit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for absorption into regular service by passing appropriate orders on the representation dated 08-072012 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: SMT V. UMA DEVI The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner has expired and in spite of best efforts, he could not contact the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner.

Having regard to the above, the writ petition is dismissed as abated.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs' SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ a--_ _SECTION OFFICER / To, 1.

2.

3.

CHR"'y oneCCtoSRI.NAYAKAWADIRAMESHA{r1ggate[oPUC] on; cc 6 SMi. v. UMA DEVI Advocate [oPUc] Two CD CoPies

I t HIGH COURT DATED:09/03/2023

ORDER

W.P.No.28681 of 2013 1d.E SI4 I{:

(-).

aL c) 1 1 [Pil 20?3 ;1 ,t '/ - -'a-2/ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS vq