M.Mukund Reddy v. Y.Rajendra Prasad
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA FIRST APPEAL No: 214 OF 2011 Appeal Under Section to set aside the judgment and decree passed in OS.No. 710 of 2005 dl.0Bl12l201O on the file of the Vlll Senior Civil Judge' Ranga Reddy district at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. Between:
M.Mukund Reddy, S/o. M.Krishna Reddy, aged about 46 yeals, Occ:Business/tVlanaging Partner Techno Constructions Flat No.402 Santoshi Apartmenti, Jyothi Colony 108, Bazar Road, Near AOC Gate' Secunderabad Presently residing at Plot No.55, Jyothi Colony, AOC Gate, SEcunderabad-50001 5 ...Appel lanUDefendant AND Y.Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Y.Shivaram, aged about 55 years, Occ:Pvt.Employee H.No.99 and 114 Pragati Enclave, Miyapur Hyderabad Ranga Reddy District ...RespondenUPlaintiff Counsel for the Appellant:SRl RAMACHANDAR RAO VEMUGANTI gs\ Counsel for the Respondents: O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGEMENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT No. 2140F 20t1, JUDG MENT:
Plaintiff filed O.S.No.710 of 2005 on the file of VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R District at L.B.Nagar, for recovery of money. The trial Court decreed the suit. The unsuccessful defendant preferred the present Appeal Suit before this Court.
2.
Learned counsel for appellant reported no instructions from the appellant.
3.
Recording the submissions of learned counsel for appellant, no purpose would be served in continuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal suit is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-M. MANJULA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The the Vlll Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.
2. One CC to SRI RAMACHANDAR RAO VEMUGANTI Advocate loPUCl
3. One CC to SRl. O MANOHER REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies MY a
I I HIGH COURT DATED:1611112023 at- ( ,r^ja q )oo \ il 2t2 :\ {'.
* JUDGEMENT eO * t PA c T AS.No.214 ot 2011 i I I DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS.
I i @cr W