S. Gajanand v. The Director Of Agriculture
_ [3255] I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PET|T|ONllfR) NO:4692OF 2017 Between:
1. S. Gajanand, S/o. Digambar, aged about 22 Years, Agriculture Extension Officer Grade-ll, Vennampally, Saidapur Mandal, O/o. Assistant Director of agriculture @, Husnabad, Karimnagar District.
2. R.Mounika, D/o. Rajaiah, aged 22 years, Agriculture Extension Officer Gradell, Mutharam, (Manthani), O/o. Assistant Director of agriculture, @, Manthani, Karimnagar District.
...APPLICANTS AND 1 . The Director of Agriculture, Government of Telangana, Opp. LB Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
2. State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Food & Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
3. The Joint Director of Agriculture, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicants are entitled for deputation to undergo study of BSc. (Ag) Course from the academic year 2015-16 in Professor Jaya Shankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad as per orders issued in G.O.Ms.No. 225, dated 11-3-1976 as amended in G.O.Ms.No. 250, dated 6-10-2009 and also letter dated 4-7-2015 of the Registrar, Professor Jaya Shankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad with all consequential benefits and pass such other and further orders. Counsel for the Applicants:SRl KNARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER
/ HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WITIT PETITION (TR) No.4692 OF 2017 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.
Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.
Miscellanecus applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.
SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSTSTANJ EEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I CI) SECTION OFFICER \ To.
"1 . One CC to SRI KNARAYANAAdvocate [OPUC] z.twoCCstoGPFoRAGR|CULTURE'HighCourtfortheStateollelangana. louTl
3. Two CD CoPies EDS GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:1911212022 STATS I f, [t rt$ c I 1$8 ()
ORDER
.ll ::''D WP(TR).N o.4692 ot 2017 DrsMrssrNc c THE WRIT pETtTtON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ca\"5 () Mff-, 4\\V