G. Venkatesh Goud, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6609 OF 2009 ORDER:
This petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Rt.No.250, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (Pts.II) Department, dated 12.02.2009 by confirming the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide proceedings No.1018/07-B1 (Panchayat)-1, dated 02.01.2008 in respect of Bondugula Village, Rajapet Mandal, Nalgonda District, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to conduct fresh enquiry regarding the allegations made against the petitioner. This petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in interfering with the poultry shed construction and feed plant/godowns being made in the land of the petitioner in Survey Nos.541/6 and 542/ situated at Gundramapally Village, Chityala Mandal, Nalgonda District, as arbitrary and illegal and for a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with the said work.
This Court on 06.03.2009, while admitting the writ petition granted interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the construction that is being undertaken by the petitioner, if there exists valid permission from the Gram Panchayat, pending further orders.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the interim
order dated 06.03.2009, entire construction has been completed. Learned Standing counsel appearing for the Gram Panchayat seeks time for getting instructions.
Since the construction is already completed, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition. But, however it is open for the respondent Gram Panchayat to take action on the petitioner if he committed any irregularities in violation of the permission granted to him, by following due process of law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 28.09.2015 tk