← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/13146/2025allowed no costs

Mohd. Zaheer Ramzani, v. The State Of Telangana,

2025-10-14K. Sujana5 pages

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13146 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition is filed praying this Court to grant pre arrest bail to the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.2 in FIR.No.334 of 2025 before the Mavala Police Station, Adilabad District.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the complainant, Sunkari Ramulu, purchased a plot in K.R.K. Colony, Adilabad, from Jeevaji Godavari in 2023 and got it registered. However, he found that someone had built a house on the plot and occupied it.

The accused, Saddam Hussain, claimed ownership of the plot and allegedly abused and threatened the complainant with a knife when questioned. The complainant lodged a police complaint, leading to the registration of a case against Saddam Hussain under sections 329(3), 318(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 351(2), r/w 3(5) of BNS. The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.2 in the case based on the confession of accused No.1.

3.

Heard Sri S.Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner, and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent - State.

4.

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that though according to prosecution, the petitioner is implicated in the case basing on confession of accused No.1 that with the help of petitioner, the accused No.1 created fabricated documents and occupied property of complainant illegally, the petitioner is innocent of the same and is no way connected to it. He asserted that accused NO.1 was arrested and released on bail. Therefore, while advocating that the petitioner is a law-abiding citizen ready to cooperate with the investigation, he prayed this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for petitioner stating that petitioner is habituated to forge documents and when accused No.1 approached the petitioner, he helped the accused No.1 in creating false document. Therefore, prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

Having regard to rival submissions made and on going through the material placed on record, it is noted that the only allegation against this petitioner is that he helped accused No.1 in creating document, and the said allegation is based on the confession of accused No.1. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of this case in detail, this Court deems it fit to grant pre-arrest bail to petitioner, subject to compliance of the following conditions:

i.

The petitioner shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Mavala Police Station, Adilabad District, within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release petitioner on bail, on his executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties, for the like sum each.

ii.

The petitioner shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

iii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every

Wednesday between 09:00 a.m, and 05:00 p.m., till the filing of the charge sheet and thereafter, as and when required.

7.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 14.10.2025 PT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13146 of 2025 Date: 14.10.2025 PT