Battu Sampath v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1415 of 2016
ORDER
The petitioner filed this Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to direct the 1st respondent-Station House Officer, Kataram Police Station, Karimnagar District, to release the vehicle bearing No.A-15-UD-TR-1098 seized in Cr.No.168 of 2015 of Kataram Police Station, Karimnagar District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of A.P.Prohibition Act.
2. Heard and perused the material available on record.
3. Petitioner herein filed an application under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Court below to release the property i.e., Hero Honda Glamour Motorcycle bearing No.AP15-UD-TR-1098 to the petitioner. By docket order dated 30.03.2016, the said petition was dismissed. Hence, the petitioner filed the present revision.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and if the vehicle is kept idle for a long period, there is every possibility of it getting damaged. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to furnish sufficient surety and also produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor objects for the same, since the vehicle is involved in a crime.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and even though the vehicle is liable to be confiscated, no prejudice
would be caused for investigation if the vehicle is released for interim custody. Therefore, it is directed that the vehicle i.e, Hero Honda Glamour Motorcycle bearing No.AP-15-UD-TR-1098, shall be released for interim custody of the petitioner, subject to final orders to be passed in the main case, on petitioner executing a personal bond for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Manthani, Karimnagar District and also on production of original R.C. book. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle, shall not change the physical features of the same till the disposal of the criminal case and further the petitioner shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court. However, it is made clear that the present order will not stand in the way of any confiscation proceedings. If already confiscation orders are passed, the order need not be given effect to.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.
______________ RAJA ELANGO, J 10th June, 2016 sj