Mohd. Masood v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

[ 32e61 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 23028 OF 2015 Between:

Mohd. Masood, S/o. Md. lsmail, Aged about 49 years, Occ Business, R/o # 09-04-29 l23l A,Tolichowki, Hakeempet, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad - 500 028

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Langer house, Hdyerabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.2 and 4 for registering a false complaint against the petitioner in crime No. 242 of 2015 on the file of police station Langer house is illegal, arbitrary and against the fundamental rights and a consequential direction to direct the respondent No 1 and 3 to initiate stringent disciplinary action against the respondent No. 2 and 4 for abusing the process of law under the guise of powers vested up on them l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP.

NO: 29773OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 & 3 to order an enquiry for the illegal acts committed by respondent No.2 & 4 in registering false case vide Crime No.

dated 03-07-2015 on the file of sHo, police station, Langarhouse, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. SIRISHA REp SRI. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOTNA Counsel for the Respondent No.1&2: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI(AR R.EDDY WRIT PETITION No.23O28 of 2O15 ORDER:

Ms.Sirisha, learned counsel representing Sri Daraboina Subramanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. G. SIREESHA ASSTSTANT EqGlqrRAR \ //TRUE COPY/'

V \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI

2. Trlvo CCs to -GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana'at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. OhE CC tO SRI. SUSRAN/'IRI.IYRM DARABOINA, AdVOCAIC IOPUC]

4. Two CD Copies BM GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:0910112024 { e STATE Op t 0 J\\ 1S2\ v o }) a oo r(!

t Drs p', \ '-

ORDER

WP.No.23028 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS W>\