← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2028/2017dismissed

Raja Sulochana v. The State Of Telangana

2017-03-14A.Shankar Narayana2 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2028 OF 2017 ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Code'), is filed requesting to quash the proceedings in D.V.C.No.15 of 2016 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vikarabad.

2. Petitioners herein are respondent Nos.2 to 8 in the aforesaid D.V.C., registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 made to the authority concerned under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and respondent No.1 in the D.V.C. is arrayed as respondent No.3 herein.

3. Heard Sri Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that when a complaint for the offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C. was lodged by respondent No.2 - de facto complainant, the Investigating Officer, on completion of investigation, charged accused No.1 therein, while arriving at the opinion that no case was made out against accused Nos.2 to 8 therein, who are the present petitioners, and, therefore, he requests to allow the present Criminal Petition.

5. This Court, in Gaddaameedi Nagamani v. State of Telangana1 (Criminal Petition No.22371 of 2015, dated 17.7.2015) 1 2015 (2) ALD (Crl.) 746 (A.P.)

Crl.P.No.2028 of 2017 ASN,J and Giduthuri Kesari Kumar v. State of Telangana2, expressed that the provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C. are inapplicable to Domestic Violence Cases, as it is not a criminal case, but falls under civil dispute.

6. I had the occasion to deal with the said issue in Crl.P.No.365 of 2017 and rendered an order on 13.03.2017 on the same lines, however, exempting appearance of the petitioners therein. The request of the learned counsel for petitioners has been that presence of the petitioners herein may be exempted in the D.V.C., in view of the opinion expressed by the Investigating Officer deleting their names, while filing charge sheet for the offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C.

7. Acceding to such a request, presence of the petitioners, who are respondent Nos.2 to 8, in D.V.C.No.15 of 2016 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vikarabad, is exempted, but, however, they are directed to appear as and when the learned Magistrate directs them to appear, if necessary.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.

___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J March 14, 2017.

MD 2 2015 (2) ALD (Crl.) 470 (A.P.)