Shri G.Narapu Reddy v. The Tahasildar(Mandal Revenue Officer)

t 33031 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: '17393 OF 2009 Between:

Shri .G,Narapu Reddy, S{o Konda Reddy, aged 86 years, Occ: Agrl., Pandurangapuram Village, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District. ...PETITIONER AND The Tahasildar (Mandal Revenue Officer), - Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District.

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioners over 8 acres of land in Sy.No.126152 Panduranga Puram Village, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District as illegal, arbitrary violative of article 19(1)(S) and 300-4 of constitution of lndia.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPI4P. NO:,22814 OF 2009) Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and not to interfere with petitioner possession over 8 acres of land in Sy.No.126152 Panduranga Puram Village, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.JAGADISHWAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.17 93 of 2OO9 ORDER:

. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Jagadishwar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.MP.No.228L4 of 2OO9 in W.p.No. 17393 of 2009, dated 2l-O8,2OOg, the grievance of the petitioner is resolved and no further adjudication is required. 2.

Recording the said submission, no further adjudication is required.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedies as available under law, if so advised. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT GIS //TRUE COPY// R R To, SECTIO FFICE One CC to SRt K.JAGADTSHWAR REDDy, Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to Gp FOR RFVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BSR GJP r $.{

HIGH COURT DATED: 2911112023 T S AT€ e t\ (

ORDER

o .b ?[B q WP.No.17393 of 2009 6 oLc o t i OFs.,^'(C CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS