R. Siva Jyothi, Hyd v. Station House Officer, Hyd And 6 Othrs

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G, RADHA RANI WRIT PETITION NO: 10046 OF 2014 Betwee n:

R. Siva Jyothi, W/o. Sai Prasad, aged 40 years, Occ: Advocate, Fl/o. 401, Sai Brindavan Residency, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. ...pE,,oNER AND

1. The Station House Officer, Chilakalaguda Police Station, Hyderabad.

2. The Asst. Commissioner of Police,, Gopalapuram Division, Hyderabad.

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,, North Zone, Hyderabad.

4. The Commissioner of Police,, Hyderabad.

5. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

6. th.Pratuysha,, D/o.Ramesh Kumar, Plot No.10, Adityanagar, Anandnagar, Road No.4, Nagole, Hyderabad.

7. Ch.Ramesh Kumar,, S/o.Laxminarayana, aged 49 years, Plot No.10, Adityanagar,Anandnagar,RoadNo.4,Nagole,Hyderabad. ...RESpoNDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased oto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in registering the Crime No.12012014 by implicating the petitioner as one of the accused even though the allegation against the petitioner is non-cognizable and barred by limitation as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to section 355 and 468 Cr.P.C., and consequently quash the investigation in Crime No. 12012014 on the file of the 1st respondent police station in the interest of justice.

WPMP. NO: 1 2605 0F 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings and investigation in Crime No. 120/2014 on the file of the Chilakalaguda Police station, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: -- The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI WRIT PETITION No.1OO46 oF 2014 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that charge sheet was filed before the Court below and as such this petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR r\ / ,t \ /_ \--,/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri p Nao

2. Two CCs to Gp For3. Two CD Copies

4. One Spare Coov MBC iN-u.

//TRUE COPY'

endra Reddy Advocate tOpUCl Home, High Court for tn'e Statdot Tetangana. [OUT]

HIGH COURT DATED: 2711012021 6E STAI€:

t-) a) r) 10 N0\J20?1 .-c r)i::.r r:--'.

ORDER

WP.No.10046 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS .\$ \)z\ fix