Mis. Surana Telecom And Powers Ltd v. State Of Telengana

IN THE HOGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD]

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WRIT PETITION No. 22269 OF 2015 Between:

M/s. Surana Telecom and Powers Ltd., 5th floor, Surya Towers, S.P Road, Secunderabad - 500 003, rep., by its Manager-Imports Mr. T.R. Venkataramanan ... Petitioner And State of Telangana, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep., by its Principal Secretary and two others ... Respondents DATE OF JUDGEMENT PRONOUNCED: 21-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No. 22269 OF 2015 PC: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This writ petition impugns the notice dated 30-04-2015 and the order dated 11-06-2015 passed by the 2nd respondent-revisional authority, whereby the petitioner's revision has been rejected. We have perused the order dated 11-06-2015. In our prima facie opinion, the order is not a speaking order dealing with all the contentions raised by the petitioner. More over, in the representation, in the form of revision, the petitioner did not raise all the contentions as raised in the instant writ petition.

Keeping that in view and considering over all facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that this writ petition can be conveniently disposed of at this stage. Leaned counsel for the parties are also not against passing of the following order: "The order dated 11-06-2015 passed by the revisional authority (annexure P-1) is set aside. The petitioner is allowed to file additional grounds for seeking revision of the assessment within a period of two weeks from today.

The revisional authority shall consider the petitioners representation/revision along with additional grounds for seeking revision, on merits in accordance with law and after giving an

opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a period of two months from today. All contentions of the parties are kept open." With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. _________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ ________________________ S.V. BHATT, J 21-07-2015 ks