← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/14466/2012closed no costs

Gaddam Sreekanth, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2018-09-11U.Durga Prasad Rao1 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Writ Petition No.14466 of 2012 ORDER:

Petitioners herein seek a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 5 to 7 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent No.8 which is subjudice in S.A.No.416 of 2010 and directing the petitioners to settle the matter with respondent No.8 as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct respondent No.4 to take action against respondents 5 to 7. 2) It is seen, this Court in WPMP No.18334 of 2012 passed the following interim order.

"Unless there are any specific orders from any civil court, the respondents 1 to 7 are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes of the petitioners. However, this order does not come in the way of police officials in proceeding with the criminal cases, if any, pending against the petitioners."

3) Both the learned counsel would submit that in view of the interim order no further orders need to be passed in the writ petition and sought to close the writ petition.

4) Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 11.09.2018 Murthy