H.Naresh, v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT Between:
H. Naresh ..... PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, rep.by its Public Prosecutor High Court, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 04.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
1.
Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?
Yes/No 2.
Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals Yes/No
3.
Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wishes to see the fair copy of the Judgment?
Yes/No ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in the event of arrest of the petitioner/ accused in Cr.No.324 of 2015 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Cyberabad, registered against the Petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.
2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the petitioner/ accused worked as Cashier in Gurunanak filling station for a period of three years and after collection of money, he has not remitted the entire money in the bank account of the de facto complainant and thereby misappropriated an amount of Rs.15 lakhs, which was noticed during the verification of accounts by the auditor of the de facto complainant .
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused submits that petitioner is falsely implicated in this case; his job was only to collect the money and handover the same to the Manager, whose job was it to deposit the same in the bank, and prayed for granting anticipatory bail.
4. Heard both the learned counsel and perused the material on
record.
5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence, the manner in which it is committed, the surrounding facts and circumstances, and the quantum of amount involved in the misappropriation, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused. There are no merits in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed accordingly.
__________________ M.S.K.JAISWAL,J Date: 04.08.2015 Kv
ORDER
Dt. 04.08.2015 Kv