Dasarilaxminarayana, v. The Tahsildar,

Date :10.10.2017 WP 26336 of 2017 Between :

Kyatham Swarupa W/o late Sadananadam H No 1-49/A Dharmaraopalle, Chityal, Warangal Petitioner And The Tahsildar, Bhupalpalli Jayashankar district Respondents The Court made the following:

COMMON ORDER:

Petitioners are aggrieved by non consideration of their applications for regularization in consequent to the scheme formulated vide G.O.Ms.No. 59 dated 30.12.2014 even though entire sale consideration was already paid. Learned counsel for petitioners sought to contend that petitioners belong to poor families and hard earned money was paid with fond hope of getting early regularization for development of their property and on account of inordinate delay in finalization of the issue, grave prejudice is caused to petitioners. 2.

Learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that from Bhupalapally, Janged and Kompally villages, 125 applications were received and to process all those applications, 3 teams were constituted. Teams so constituted scrutinized applications of 87 persons and 38 more applications are to be scrutinized. The above three villages now form part of Bhupalpally Jayashankar district. Learned Government Pleader further submits that on account of formation of new districts and recent decision taken by the Government to undertake extensive revision of revenue records, the process of further scrutiny of remaining applications could not be taken up and requested some more time to complete the process.

3.

Learned counsel for petitioners only submits that since there is inordinate delay already caused, a time frame may be fixed for completing the process.

4.

Having regard to the above submissions, writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 to 4 to finalise the process of applications of all the applicants for regularization in accordance with the scheme formulated in G O Ms No. 59 dated 30.12.2014 in the three villages mentioned above as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If according to the assessment of respondents, petitioners

are not entitled for such regularization, they may be informed by a reasoned order and it is open to the petitioners to workout their remedies as available in law. No costs. Having regard to the same, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

______________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE:10.10.2017 TVK

Date :10.10.2017