Marri Madhavi v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13511 of 2025 ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner, on bail, who is arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.367 of 2025 of Begumpet Police Station, Hyderabad.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that on 11.09.2025, the Begumpet Police received credible information that one woman organizer, Mari Madhavi, was running a brothel house at her residence near the Grave Yard, Mahaparinirvana, Dhanyalaguttta, Begumpet, Secunderabad. Basing upon the information, the police conducted a raid and allegedly found the organizer, one female sex worker, and a male customer inside the premises. Cash, mobile phones, and condoms were seized, and all three were apprehended and produced before the competent authority.
3.
Heard Smt.
K.N.
Shalini Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun
Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was innocent and falsely implicated in the case and that the petitioner had nothing to do with the alleged offence and that the accusations were false and baseless. He contended that the police had already completed the entire investigation, examined all material witnesses, and only the filing of the charge sheet remained. The petitioner was a permanent resident of Hyderabad with no likelihood of absconding and had been in judicial custody since 11.09.2025. Therefore, she prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is an organizer. There are serious allegations against the petitioner. Further, the investigation was not yet completed. At this stage, granting of bail to the petitioner does not arise. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on
record, it appears that the petitioner has been in jail since 11.09.2025. As seen from the record, the material part of the investigation has already been completed, and 11 witnesses have been examined.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i.
The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Secunderabad.
ii.
The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 07.11.2025 SAI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13511 of 2025 Date: 07.11.2025 sai