Cheguri Mallesh v. The State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Criminal Petition No.8814 OF 2018 ORDER:

The petitioner is A1 in Crime No.1190 of 2018 on the file of the Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Rangareddy District. The crime is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 451, 427, 436 r/w 34 IPC. The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail claiming that he is a Government employee and it is a false implication.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State of Telangana in opposing the same and perused the F.I.R. and the anticipatory bail application averments.

3.

A perusal of the grounds urged in the bail application shows the son of de facto complainant fell in love with the sister of petitioner and while he was taking her on his bike as pillion rider, there was an accident wherein she was succumbed to death on the night of 18.06.2018, for which Crime No.578 of 2018 was registered on 19.06.2018 for the offence punishable under Section 304-A IPC. C.Mallesh-petitioner herein is the de facto complainant therein. It is the contention therefrom it is a false case foisted on suspicion and outcome of earlier crime pending without any basis. 4.

A perusal of the F.I.R. shows the de facto complainant G.Shusheela, Home guard, on information about her house was

Dr. SSRB, J Crl. P.No.8814 of 2018 burning on 29.07.2018 morning, she along with her brother-in-law's son Mukesh came there and found it was burning and the door lock was replaced with another lock thereby, it was after break open and when entered inside, the entire house was mostly burn to ashes and they are suspecting Jangaiah's son Mallesh, wife of Mallesh by name Sudha and Jangaiah's wife Laxmi. The petitioner is Cheguri Mallesh, S/o. Jangaiah and he is the Government employee. 5.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the anticipatory bail application saying the investigation is at nasal stage and there is a motive including from the earlier report covered by Crime No.578 of 2018 dated 19.06.2018 and sought for dismissal. 6.

In view of the above, the petitioner-A1 does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail from the propensity of crime, but for if at all to surrender and move for regular bail before the learned Special Judge concerned, where make a request of any arrest beyond 48 hours leads to suspension of him from service, for consideration with necessary conditions.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. ____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 29.08.2018 MVA