High Court for State of TelanganaSA/889/2017withdrawn

Dr Tajeswara Rao, Hyd v. Rambilas Agarwal (Died), Hyd And 8 Others

2023-01-02G.Radha Rani3 pages

[ 321s ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD tVtONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI SECOND APPEAL NO: 889 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 0610612017 made in AS No.286 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad preferred against the decree in OS No.430l of 2OO7 dated 1410312012 on the file of the Court of the Vlll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.

Between:

Dr. Tajeswara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND

1. Rambilas Aganival (DIED), per LRs

2. Smt. Angoori Bai,, w/o Late Rambilas Agarwal Aged about 70 years, Occ: Housewife No 21-1-225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

3. Anup Kumar, S/o Late Rambilas Aganrval Aged about 52 years, Occ: Business, No 21-1-225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

4. Gopal, S/o Late Rambilas Agarwal Aged 50 years, Occ: Business, No 21-1225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

5. Anand, S/o. Late Rambilas Agan,ual Aged 31 years, Occ: Business, PJo21-1225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

6. Praveen, S/o Late Rambilas Aganrual Aged 29 years, Occ: Business, No211-225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

7. Ritesh, S/o Late Rambilas Aganrval Aged 27 years, Occ; Business, tr.Jo21-1225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

8. Smt. Savitri Bai, W/o Late Ashok Kumar Occ: House Hold Rt/o 21-1-225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad

9. Shyamal Agaruval, S/o Late Chotilal Agarwal Occ: Business, No 21-1-225, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : SRI D.MADHAVA RAO, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.2,3,4,5 : SRI SHARAD SANGHI, Advocate The Court delivered the following : JUDGIvIENT

THE TION,BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI SE'COND APPEAL No.889 of 2OL7

JUDGMENT

Learner I ,:ounsel for the appellant submitt r:rl tl-rat the i parties havt: r;ettled the matter outside the (l:urt and ' therelbre tht: cause in the appeal become itrfruc-'tous In vier,, of the above submission, the Secorl<: Appeal is dismissecl al i rfructuous' No costs'

Pendir-g miscellaneous applications' if irnl ' sharll stancl closer, "";?,1ilH[t?$,EtR //TRUE COPY'

r-i __ $EC,TION OFFICER t q1#5i; I*r*Itn#lfif**'+'i'rt*,."'

To Ki e

HIGH COURT DATED:02/01/2023i .-:-.:.::1.-.

.:\ :\ i;..

: .

I .j ) j LPf ?[R

JUDGMENT

SA.No.889 ol 2017 .- ,'i, .' . i''

'i..,i DISMISSED AS INF TLICTUOUS.

ss &o a?