← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/32184/2024disposed of no costs

P. Krishna Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

2024-12-04B.Vijaysen Reddy5 pages

[ 3183 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32184 OF 2024 Between:

P. Krishna Reddy, S/o P.Jagan Mohan Reddy, aged about 51 years, Occ ; Contractor, R-/o Alwal Village, Tirumalagiri Mandal, Nalogonda District. .....PET]TIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep. By its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda.

3. The Deputy Superintenent of Police, Miryalaguda Zone, Nalgonda District.

4. The Station House Officer, Aliya Police Station, Nalgonda District. : ,....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent police in taking action against the culprits pursuant to the complaints dt. 21-4-2023 and 99-2024 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent police to act upon the complaints dt.214-2023 and 9-92024 and take action against the culprits as per Law. |.A.NO:1 OF 2024 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

direct the respondent police to register FIR against the culprits pursuant to the complaints dt.21-4-20?-3 and 9-9-2024, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CH.BUCHI RAJU Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER

,.*.-...*7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VUAYSEN REDDY RIT P ONN 4ot ORDER:

The writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondent police in not taking action against the culprits pursuant \ \ to the complaints dated 2t.O4.2023 and 09.09.2024, as arbitrary and illegal.

2.

Learned Assistant Government pleader for Home, on the basis written instructions, submitted that the complaint of the petitioner dated O9.09.2024 was received by the respondent No.3, who forwarded the same to Thirumalagiri (S) police Station, Nalgonda District and based on the same. GD entry was made on 2L.O9.2O24. Except sending the complaint, the peUtioner did not enclose any documents in support of his version. As and when the petitioner approaches the police station along with necessary documents and witnesses, appropriate action will be taken. 3.

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to approach the Station House Officer, Thirumalagiri (S) police Station, Nalgonda District, with necessary documents and witnesses. On receipt of the same, the appropriate action shall be taken as per the guidelines issued by the supreme Court in LALITHA KUMARI v. GOW. OF U.P.l.

'(2014) 2 scc l

The writ petition is closed. The miscellaneous applications, if any pending. shall stand closed- There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// s ICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad. [OUTI

2. Oie CC to SRI CH BUCHI RAJU, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies t/ SA PSK

c HIGH COURT DATED:0411212024 1riE S14k 3 0r r:;

luarl

ORDER

{i,.

o WP.No.32184 of 2024 t e1;.1616.uFoCLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

/ f.fr 61l, tt