Gone Ramgopal Rao v. G.Suguna Devi

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.295 OF 2009 JUDGMENT:

In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appellant that both the parties in this appeal expired sometime back. 2.

The said submission is taken on record.

3.

Under these circumstances, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as abated.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J __________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J Date: 01.04.2022 ssp

This appeal, under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the order, dated 29.11.2007 passed in F.C.O.P.No.310 of 2006 by the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, whereby the subject O.P. filed by the appellant, under Section 6(A) and Section 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act seeking custody of minor children from the respondent, was partly allowed directing the respondent to hand over the minor child Prerna Jain to the appellant and also ordered that the appellant is responsible for the welfare of the minor child Prerna Jain.

2.

No representation for both sides. Perused the record. 3.

The subject F.C.O.P. was filed by the appellant herein seeking custody of his minor children, by name, Prerna Jain, 4 years and Pooja Jain, 21⁄2 years. As on today, both the children attained the age of majority.