Mushtaq Shah v. State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Criminal Petition No.8891 OF 2018 ORDER:

The petitioner is A1 among two or more accused in Crime No.220 of 2018 on the file of Chandrayanagutta Police Station, Hyderabad. The crime is registered on 30.07.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 354 & 506 IPC.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State of Telangana in opposing the same and perused the F.I.R. and the bail application averments.

3.

The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated without basis. 4.

A perusal of the very report shows there is prima facie accusation against the petitioner and the de facto complainant's mother even leave about the contention of the bad conduct of the husband of de facto complainant and his involvement in more than 3 or 4 crimes that is not even remotely connected with the report against the petitioner to take advantage out of it in seeking the anticipatory bail.

5.

Having regard to the above, the petitioner-A1 no way deserves the concession of anticipatory bail.

Dr. SSRB, J Crl. P.No.8891 of 2018 Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that for none of the offences are punishable above seven years, the petitioner-A1 is entitled to protection of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and the police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. ____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 30.08.2018 MVA