Syed Lmranullah Quadri, v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.17639 of 2014 in Crl.P.No.15413 of 2014 and Criminal Petition No.15413 of 2014 COMMON ORDER:

The defacto complainant and her counsel Sri Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig Nizami are present. A.1 and his Counsel Vladimeer Khatoon are present.

On the report given by de-facto complainant, the Police of Women P.S, Hyderabad City, registered FIR No.253/2014 against the accused for the offences under Sec.498-A, 420, 406, 506 r/w 34 IPC and Sec.4 & 6 of D.P. Act and investigation is reported to be pending.

While-so, both parties and their counsel present in Court today and submitted that at the intervention of elders, they have amicably resolved their disputes and accordingly the defacto complainant and A.1 obtained divorce and the defacto complainant has no objection for quashment of the proceedings and therefore, permission may be accorded to them to compound the offence and quash the proceedings in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission of the parties and in view of the fact that it is a matrimonial matter wherein the parties have amicably settled their disputes and also considering that no useful purpose will be served even if the investigation is ordered to be continued since the parties have compromised and following the decision reported in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, this petition is allowed and permission is accorded to the parties to compound the offence and consequently proceedings against A.1 in FIR No.253 of 2014 on the file of Women P.S, Hyderabad City, are hereby quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly allowed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 17.03.2015 scs