G. Thirupathaiah, v. Apsrtc, Rep By Its Vc And Md

[ 33031 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11754 OF 2017 Between:

G. Thirupathalah, TSRTC Conductor, Aged about 35 years, E 152177, Kalwakurthy depot, 1-21 6, Jillelaguda, Saroornagar, Rangareddy dist tTtoNER AND

1. APSRTC, Rep by its VC AND MD, Musheerabad, Hyderabad (Now changed as Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Musheerbad, Hyderabad)

2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, (Now changed as Telangana State Road Transport Corporation) Kalwakurthy Depot, Kalwakurthy, Nagarkurnool Dist.

3. The Presiding officer, Labour Court-11'1 , Nampally, ,rO"r"O.O.:.*=spoNDENrs Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issued a Writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, declaring the Award in lD NO- 9 OF 2014, DATED 15-9-2016 on the file of 3rd respondent, (published in terms of G.O.RI NO 120, dated 23-2-2017) as illegal and arbitrary and quash the same after calling the records on the file of 3rd respondent and further direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to reinstate the petitioner into service as conductor with all consequential benefits including all attendant benefits and full back wages Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P GOVINDA RAJULU Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: THOOM SRINIVAS (SC FOR TSRTC) Counsel for Respondent No. 3: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTIIAS RAO WRIT PETITI ON No. 11754 of2Ol7 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for consideratron, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondents submits that the issue raised in this Writ petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.16036 of 2017, dated 18.08.2O23.

2.

In view of the principles laid down in the above said order, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief sought in this Writ Petition.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGIST,RAR w SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Presiding officer, Labour Court-l '1 1, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri P Govinda Rajulu, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP For Labour, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Thoom Srinivas (SC FOR TSRTC) Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies MBC GJ 8uc"

HIGH COURT DATED: 1911012023 -1jr rE S.IA r Q^ s cd 15 Nti'il 2ii1 ,;.,.{ \., ,i _t;1 3;s,1.i1;t'l '_-!

\-.. . _--_:;-'

ORDER

WP.No.11754 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS fv\q.

3\ >3