← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/3974/2017dismissed as infructuous

D. Narsimhulu v. The District Education Officer

2022-12-20N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

[ 32s5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 3974 OF 2017 Between:

D. Narsimhulu, S/o Badru, Age: 35 years, School Asst (Physics), Z.P.H.School, Raghupathipet, Kalvakurthi Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. APPLICANT ANO The District Education Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District.50900'1 The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.500004 The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.500022 ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled to be transferred to the schools situated in Agency area of Mahbubnagar District on the basis of the entitlement points in the ensuing transfer counseling since he was appointed/posted in Agency area with all consequential benefits in terms of Notification issued in G.O.Ms.No.3 SW dt.10.01.2000 by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicant for transfer to Agency area schools is illegal and contrary to the Notification vide G.O.Ms.No.3 dt.10.01.2009, discriminatory and unjust. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.3974 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANTRE6BTNAN L'rlSECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRt K. SARATH Advocate [OpUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATTON ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies KKS BS I //TRUE COPY// I Bsr

HIGH COURT DATED:2011212022 ,lj :-i'

ORDER

','l WP(TR).No.3974 ot 2017 7 5 JAil 2U23 j DrsMrssrNG oF THE WRIT PET|T|ON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6_..- /.r\o\'g $(L