High Court for State of TelanganaWP/24927/2015disposed of no costs

Musham Chander, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

2015-08-10P Naveen Rao2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ******** WRIT PETITION NO.24927 of 2015 Between :

Musham Chander S/o.Shekaraiah, Aged 48 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.H.No.13-53, Huzurabad, Warangal Road, Huzurabad Mandal, Karimnagar District.

.. Petitioner and The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & another.

.. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED : 10.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers : Yes / No may be allowed to see the Judgments ?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes / No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to : Yes / No see the fair copy of the Judgment ?

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.24927 of 2015 ORDER :

The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner of the property in Sy.No.2380/B admeasuring 322.05 Square yards, Vidyanagar, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. The petitioner intend to construct a residential house and applied for grant of building permission and accordingly the permission was granted on 22.03.2014. The petitioner now alleges that even though he has valid building permission and is undertaking construction in accordance with the said permission granted, the authorities of the respondent are interfering and obstructing the construction taken up by the petitioner. Aggrieved thereby, this writ petition is instituted.

2. Learned Standing counsel fairly submits that the Municipality is not interfering with the construction of the petitioner and it is a false allegation made by the petitioner.

3. Having regard to the respective submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities, not to interfere with the construction activity of the petitioner consequent to the building permission granted on 22.03.2014, if the said building permission is not rescinded and shall ensure that the petitioner is not deviating from the sanctioned plan. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 10th August, 2015.

Rds